without a break in continuity, even with references found in the classical history of psychiatry, and which, brought back to the clinic of the real, participate in logic book from .
And who says logic says

convergence and consistency. It is at this point, in this desire, that we lodge the ethics of psychoanalysis in the field of psychosis. This is also what makes this work not devoid of poetry. Indeed, it is characterized by the refusal of any exhaustion, but also of any academic explanation.

We will find in this vein, associations, new articulations that are real nuggets. Let us cite a few without trying to say them all, they set the tone and put on the path of new research perspectives. Because this work does not block desire, it causes it. If it begins with what is essential in the history of psychoses in psychoanalysis, President Schreber, it is to formulate: “Schreber then becomes the theoretician of his symptom, contributing at the same time to treating it and to making it a production of knowledge” (5) . Is this not the teaching of the sinthome,

which retroactively illuminates the

How to move from the psychiatric clinic and discordance to the analytical clinic of consistency, that of the object and the body  mobile database caught in the symptom, is the challenge of this work. The passage from meaning to nonsense via reality leads us there. We have to break with what we cannot spontaneously imagine. “The most meaningless form of what can nevertheless be imagined is consistency. Nothing forces us to imagine consistency, imagine” (6) says Lacan. It is towards this “new knowledge” (7) whose basis is exceptional customer care on social media  less in speech and its troubles than in writing and the response it provides, that Fabienne Hulak deploys, unfolds, mixes without confusing art and madness. The writings constitute the backbone, we find Lacan’s

From writing to lalangue in a single word

there is only the space of a logical advance. It continues with the dimension that the author reserves for the use of lalangue. The use that a subject deprived of the signifier that cushions enjoyment can nevertheless make of it to consist clean email  of being and ex-sisting. The known one, that Wolfson invents but also the one that marks the cases of “ordinary psychosis”. (8) We will be sensitive to the link that goes from paraphrenia to ordinary psychosis, a link that is not banal but whose interest is that the minimal or not delirium, is combined with “the clearly known ambient reality”.