Home » Articles » The Committee does specify that states

The Committee does specify that states

The GC states in para 73 that “Subject to any obligations under international law! including those contain in multilateral environmental agreements to which they are party! States retain discretion in arriving at a reasonable balance between determining. The appropriate levels of environmental protection and achieving other social goals in the light of available resources” (italics add). In outlining this limitation! the Committee does not draw on its previous work on limitations/restrictions or on that of other treaty bodies (see e.g.! Nolan 2022). No further detail is provid on.

What such a reasonable balance might

What the relevant “social goals” to be taken into account . While this language appears to be drawn from the Framework Principles on Human Rights a the Environment produc the Special Rapporteur on human country email list rights a the environment (which in turn draws on limitations jurisprudence from other human rights bodies with a judicial quasi-judicial mandate)! more detail would have been valuable here given the Committee’s interpretative mandate a CRC-specific focus. (The Framework Principles did not refer to the CRC in this context).

The Committee goes on to state that “[n]evertheless! such leeway is limit by the obligations of States under the Convention”.

This arguably provides limit assistance as

The GC merely goes on to refer to states’ “heighten email marketing statistics and interesting facts duty of care” to children (again! a novel element in terms of the Committee’s previous work – albeit familiar from tort law climate justice. Litigation argumentation) and the ne for states to avoid the disproportionate and long-term effects of environmental harm experienc by The Committee does children as group.  “should therefore china numbers set and enforce environmental standards that protect children from such disproportionate and long-term effects” and this wording may be intend to flesh out the parameters of “appropriate levels of environmental protection” for the purposes of the balancing exercise envisag by the Committee.

Scroll to Top